Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg76016] Re: [mg75957] Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 04:41:50 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200705110933.FAA06232@smc.vnet.net> <f21g6n$7hg$1@smc.vnet.net> <200705140733.DAA22822@smc.vnet.net>
On 14 May 2007, at 16:33, rip pelletier wrote: > thanks for the suggestions. it seems the problem is more complicated > than i thought. i need to do some work to find out why i get an error > message saying Rectangle cannot be called with 3 arguments, although > such calls work for other people. > Well, actually, I have to confess that my case may not be decisive because, although I use the same version of Mac OS X as you do, I am still running a beta version of Mathematica 6.0. If Jens-Peer Kuska is also doing that, then it is still possible that this behaviour was changed at the last moment. To settle the issue I hope someone else with a officially released version of Mathematica confirms that Rectangle still works with 3 arguments. Of course, Jens may have already confirmed this ;-) Andrzej Kozlowski
- References:
- v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- From: rip pelletier <bitbucket@comcast.net>
- Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
- From: rip pelletier <bitbucket@comcast.net>
- v. 6, third argument to rectangle