[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg76016] Re: [mg75957] Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
• From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
• Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 04:41:50 -0400 (EDT)
• References: <200705110933.FAA06232@smc.vnet.net> <f21g6n$7hg$1@smc.vnet.net> <200705140733.DAA22822@smc.vnet.net>

On 14 May 2007, at 16:33, rip pelletier wrote:

> thanks for the suggestions. it seems the problem is more complicated
> than i thought. i need to do some work to find out why i get an error
> message saying Rectangle cannot be called with 3 arguments, although
> such calls work for other people.
>

Well, actually, I have to confess that my case may not be decisive  
because, although I use the same version of Mac OS X as you do, I am  
still running a beta version of Mathematica 6.0. If Jens-Peer Kuska  
is also doing that, then it is still possible that this behaviour was  
changed at the last moment. To settle the issue I hope someone else  
with a officially released version of Mathematica confirms that  
Rectangle still works with 3 arguments.
Of course, Jens may have already confirmed this ;-)

Andrzej Kozlowski

• References:
  • v. 6, third argument to rectangle
    • From: rip pelletier <bitbucket@comcast.net>
  • Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
    • From: rip pelletier <bitbucket@comcast.net>