Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2007
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg76063] Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
  • From: Bill Rowe <readnewsciv at sbcglobal.net>
  • Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 05:06:00 -0400 (EDT)

On 5/14/07 at 3:33 AM, bitbucket at comcast.net (rip pelletier) wrote:

>In article <f21g6n$7hg$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
>"Chris Chiasson" <chris at chiasson.name> wrote:

>>Try Inset

>>Also, you may want to change the AspectRatio->All for the graphs
>>that you are insetting.

>>BTW, the 6.0 syntax highlighter isn't always right.

>thanks for the suggestions. it seems the problem is more complicated
>than i thought. i need to do some work to find out why i get an
>error message saying Rectangle cannot be called with 3 arguments,
>although such calls work for other people.

If your goal is to have two graphs side by side what about either

GraphicsRow[{Plot[x, {x, 0, 1}], LogPlot[2^x, {x, 0, 1}]}]

or

Grid[{{Plot[x, {x, 0, 1}], LogPlot[2^x, {x, 0, 1}]}}]
--
To reply via email subtract one hundred and four


  • Prev by Date: Re: Deleting duplicates from a list
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
  • Previous by thread: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
  • Next by thread: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle