|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Using N function
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg76281] Re: [mg76270] Using N function
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 04:30:07 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200705181031.GAA13821@smc.vnet.net>
On 18 May 2007, at 19:31, kkwweett wrote:
>
> Good morning Mathematica users,
>
>
> Can anyone tell me, please, which of a),b) or c) is wrong :
>
> a)
> <MathematicaHelp>
> <quote>
>
> N[expr] is equivalent to N[expr, MachinePrecision].
>
> </quote>
> </MathematicaHelp>
>
> b)
> In[1]:=N[Exp[Sqrt[163 ]Pi] - 640320^3]
> Out[1]=256.
>
>
> c)
> In[2]:=N[Exp[Sqrt[163 ]Pi] - 640320^3,$MachinePrecision]
> Out[2]=743.9999999999993
>
> ?
>
> Thank you
>
$MachinePrecision and MachinePrecision are different. The first is a
number (evaluate it on your platform); on my I get:
In[21]:= $MachinePrecision
Out[21]= 15.9546
So N[ ,$MachinePrecision] is essenitally N[ ,16] - quite different
forn N[] which is N[ ,MachinePrecision].
N[Exp[Sqrt[163] Pi] - 640320^3, MachinePrecision]
256.
N[Exp[Sqrt[163] Pi] - 640320^3, $MachinePrecision]
743.9999999999993
Moral: $ still matters.
Andrzej Kozlowski
Prev by Date:
Re: Re: weird behavior when plotting multiple functions in 6.0
Next by Date:
[6] LinearAlgebra`MatrixManipulation` LinearEquationsToMatrices [Where to find, missing in 6.0, what to replace with?]
Previous by thread:
Re: Using N function
Next by thread:
using N function
|