MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: silly problem

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg85299] Re: silly problem
  • From: dh <dh at metrohm.ch>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:38:32 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <fo9g1h$sbm$1@smc.vnet.net>


Hi Francis,

it looks like your "k" has a value. Remove this value by k=. and 

everything will work.

hope this helps, Daniel



Francis Bitonti wrote:

> I'm new to Mathematica so this is a very basic question I think. but one

> that has me hung up. I keep getting this error

> 

> Set::write: Tag List in {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}[1] is Protected. >>

> 

> 

> my code looks like this.

> 

> *IN:*

> For[i = 1, i < 6 , i++,

>  Print[

>   g = i;

>   k[g] = twoDcalc[e1, a1, nodes[[{edges[[g, 1]], edges[[g, 2]]}]]]

>   ]]

> 

> 

> *

> OUT:

> **Set::write: Tag List in {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}[1] is Protected. >>

> *{{3.26002*10^7,7.60672*10^7,-3.26002*10^7,-7.60672*10^7},{7.60672*10^\

> 7,1.7749*10^8,-7.60672*10^7,-1.7749*10^8},{-3.26002*10^7,-7.60672*10^\

> 7,3.26002*10^7,7.60672*10^7},{-7.60672*10^7,-1.7749*10^8,7.60672*10^7,\

> 1.7749*10^8}}*

> 

> Set::write: Tag List in {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}[2] is Protected. >>

> *{{1.7749*10^8,7.60672*10^7,-1.7749*10^8,-7.60672*10^7},{7.60672*10^7,\

> 3.26002*10^7,-7.60672*10^7,-3.26002*10^7},{-1.7749*10^8,-7.60672*10^7,\

> 1.7749*10^8,7.60672*10^7},{-7.60672*10^7,-3.26002*10^7,7.60672*10^7,3.\

> 26002*10^7}}

> 

> *Set::write: Tag List in {0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0}[3] is Protected. >>

> General::stop: Further output of Set::write will be suppressed during \

> this calculation. >>

> *{{1.88562*10^8,-1.88562*10^8,-1.88562*10^8,1.88562*10^8},{-1.88562*10^\

> 8,1.88562*10^8,1.88562*10^8,-1.88562*10^8},{-1.88562*10^8,1.88562*10^\

> 8,1.88562*10^8,-1.88562*10^8},{1.88562*10^8,-1.88562*10^8,-1.88562*10^\

> 8,1.88562*10^8}}*

> *

> 

> 




  • Prev by Date: Mathematica 6.0.0 no graphics output on Windows XP
  • Next by Date: Re: Equi-sized tick labels
  • Previous by thread: silly problem
  • Next by thread: Re: silly problem