[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Solve[] doesn't
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg90626] Re: [mg90619] Solve[] doesn't
*From*: Curtis Osterhoudt <cfo at lanl.gov>
*Date*: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:32:34 -0400 (EDT)
*Organization*: LANL
*References*: <200807161029.GAA08789@smc.vnet.net>
*Reply-to*: cfo at lanl.gov
Is your syntax correct? Especially your equal signs are assignments, rather
than tests for equality. When those are changed, at least in v. 6.0.3 for
linux, things work fine:
eqns = {x - y == 1, x^2 + y^2 == 3, x^3 - y^3 == 4}
Solve[eqns, {x, y}]
{{x -> (1/2)*(1 - Sqrt[5]),
y -> (1/2)*(-1 - Sqrt[5])}, {x -> (1/2)*(1 + Sqrt[5]),
y -> (1/2)*(-1 + Sqrt[5])}}
OR
Eliminate[eqns, y]
-x + x^2 == 1
Solve[%, x]
{{x -> (1/2)*(1 - Sqrt[5])}, {x -> (1/2)*(1 + Sqrt[5])}}
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 04:29:42 Hauke Reddmann wrote:
> This is extremely annoying.
> I have a very large (this seems to be critical) equation
> system. It's partly linear, partly horror, but already
> after I solve the linear part, a certain solution (which
> is obviously one since substituting it in makes all equations
> identical zero) can't be found anymore. The solution has some
> surds (this also seems critical, the ones without are found)
> but the equations are strictly polynomic.
>
> Faked Example (the real one only PM-ed, since it's a bit
> oversized):
>
> x-y=1
> x^2+y^2=3
> x^3-y^3=4
> and after y was eliminated, it doesn't find x. (=golden mean here)
>
> Huh?
--
==========================================================
Curtis Osterhoudt
cfo at remove_this.lanl.and_this.gov
PGP Key ID: 0x4DCA2A10
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments
See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
==========================================================
Prev by Date:
**Problem NSolve**
Next by Date:
**Using manipulate with PlotDensities**
Previous by thread:
**Solve[] doesn't**
Next by thread:
**Re: Solve[] doesn't**
| |