MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: fellow authors

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg92469] Re: fellow authors
  • From: "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 18:29:58 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <gbulcp$l4v$1@smc.vnet.net>

Do you mean that the book will be in the form of Mathematica notebooks and 
not printed in static form? In that case you can do wonderful things because 
of all the graphical and dynamic capabilities of Mathematica.

I think that the proper tool will be Wolfram Workbench - but unfortunately 
it is not yet in shape for this purpose. Any book will probably have enough 
new routines to warrant one or more packages that go with the book. Then a 
'book project' would consist of the packages, one or more folders that 
contained all the book notebooks (perhaps with their own style sheet) and 
documentation. The documentation would not only link to the package function 
pages, but also to the set of book notebooks and the notebooks could link 
back to the rest of the documentation. The first page of the documentation 
would probably be a table of contents to the book, and also links to any 
package documentation.   But all of this was very ragged and not basically 
working in the last Workbench. There is also a problem when some of the 
packages are loaded with a stub package using DeclarePackage statements. I 
think that WRI is aware of the problems and possibilities but we just have 
to wait and see what gets implemented.

If this kind of structure were implemented in Workbench, then it could be 
used not only for books, but would also be convenient for college courses, 
research projects, consulting projects and one's own self-study of existing 
books or topics.

One of the objectives I have for the Presentations package is to be able to 
write notebooks that look much more like regular textbooks or research 
papers. Some of the features it has are: routines to keep a set of 
references in whatever style you want; keeping automatically numbered key 
equations; writing fairly general ellipses expressions and converting them 
to regular Mathematica statements; formatting 'page' displays that hide the 
Mathematica specifications and concentrate on the subject matter; gathering 
multiple-page calculations, proofs and derivations into compact spaces that 
show the structure of the derivation and in which pages can be individually 
displayed or launched in separate windows; the implementation of sidebar 
notebooks. If you wish, you can write notebooks that show no Input/Output 
statements at all. How many Input/Output statements do you see in regular 
textbooks?

For those who want to see an example of this style I have a PDF version of a 
notebook on a derivation of the area swept out by the focal angle in an 
ellipse using a very nice method presented by David Cantrell. The notebook 
goes all the way from the definition of an ellipse to plotting orbits around 
the sun and everything is done actively with Mathematica. If you wish a copy 
just send me an email. Of course, the PDF doesn't have the active dynamic 
capabilities that the notebook has.

-- 
David Park
djmpark at comcast.net
http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/


"1s1k" <pennsylvaniajake at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:gbulcp$l4v$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> For those that are writing a book using Mathematica.  What program are
> you using for the book, Mathematica?  If so how are you setting it
> up?
>
> I am making each of my chapters a separate note book, and using the
> default setting.
>
> I have run across author tools in a book "Mathematica Navigator" by
> Keikki Ruskeepaa.  He used an Author program that was an add on in
> mathematica 5.  What I have found out about this program in version 6,
> is that it is not very good.  Is there another add on for writing a
> text book?
>
> thanks
> Prof. Jake
> 



  • Prev by Date: Re: Real and Complex Roots presented in a single plot
  • Next by Date: RE: Plotting f = Function[x,expr] and f[x_] := expr
  • Previous by thread: Re: fellow authors
  • Next by thread: Re: fellow authors