Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg92378] Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems
- From: Paolo Bientinesi <pauldj at aices.rwth-aachen.de>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:33:40 -0400 (EDT)
Hi everybody, As part of a presentation to students, I will have to support the claim that "Mathematica is better than other systems when it comes to symbolic computations". Some experts in other systems will be giving a 15 min presentation to convince the audience of the contrary, and then it will be my turn. At this point I am quite clueless on how to make my point across. First of all, I am not at all familiar with any other system's symbolic toolboxes, so I don't know what are the weaknesses. Also, I am not sure what kind of demo could really make an impression on graduate students and colleagues. Has any of you any experience on this? Ideas? Suggestions? Thank you! -- Prof. Paolo Bientinesi, Ph.D. RWTH Aachen University, AICES pauldj at aices.rwth-aachen.de pauldj at alumni.cs.utexas.edu
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems
- From: "peter lindsay" <pl.0@me.com>
- Re: Comparison between Mathematica and other symbolic systems