MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: A Sum-like notation for iteration

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg102422] Re: [mg102415] Re: A Sum-like notation for iteration
  • From: "David Park" <djmpark at>
  • Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 06:03:38 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <h5bk7g$hn3$> <h5ebii$1rc$> <25942001.1249723828825.JavaMail.root@n11>

One possibility is to use ellipsis notation from Presentations.

iTable[f[x], {x, 1, 3, , 99}]


Generalizing the second case somewhat:

iTable[f[Subscript[x, i]], {i, 1, 2, , n}, tag1]
% // iTableNormalize[tag1, {Subscript[x, i], {3, 1, 100, Sin[2]}}]

{f[Subscript[x, 1]],f[Subscript[x, 2]],\[CenterEllipsis],f[Subscript[x, n]]}

{f[3], f[1], f[100], f[Sin[2]]}

Ellipsis expressions are common mathematical notations and mathematicians
are pretty quick to spot the patterns. But they certainly aren't a universal

By the way, T-Rex had a brain both in his head, and a smaller brain in his
tail. He was thus able to reason both a priori and a posteriori.

David Park
djmpark at  

From: magma [mailto:maderri2 at] 

Quote: how do we format something like Table[f[x], {x, 1, 100, 2}]?
worse, Table[f[x], {x, {1,2,3,4,5}}]? Whatever solution is chosen, the
point is that it is no longer "intuitive", at least not in the sense
that one could readily guess what it should look like.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Export tiff problems
  • Next by Date: Re: DOCS: debugger + theorem prover
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: A Sum-like notation for iteration
  • Next by thread: Re: A Sum-like notation for iteration