Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Log[x]//TraditionalForm


U¿ytkownik "Murray Eisenberg" <murray at math.umass.edu> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci 
news:gmgv0g$33k$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> So far as I have seen, almost any recently published, high-selling
> textbook in calculus -- as distinct from advanced calculus or analysis
> -- aimed at the U.S. market uses ln rather than log for the natural
> logarithm.
>
> No wonder students are confused when they go on to a more advanced
> course and suddenly it's log, not ln.
>
> Then of course there's the issue that computer scientists often use log
> to mean base-2 log.


Question: how high-selling must be a book in USA to *prove* that pi is equal 
exactly 3 ?

What is a criteria for "advanced book"? Answer: useage Log instead ln...

What have AMS estabilished about ln/log notation?

slawek

BTW, SQR is the square-root in BASIC, but  SQR is the square of a number in 
Pascal. 



  • Prev by Date: Re: Log[x]//TraditionalForm
  • Next by Date: Re: Directory[]
  • Previous by thread: Re: Log[x]//TraditionalForm
  • Next by thread: Re: Log[x]//TraditionalForm