- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg96283] Re: Log[x]//TraditionalForm
- From: "slawek" <human at site.pl>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:16:44 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200902031132.GAA00303@smc.vnet.net> <7461949.1234000227010.JavaMail.root@m02> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
U¿ytkownik "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
news:gmp121$c7f$1 at smc.vnet.net...
> Mathematical symbols are always arbitrary and the only important thing is
> that a book or application make explicit the meaning of the symbols used.
> And Mathematica does make clear how Log is used. Presumably, the reader or
> user will know what he wants.
Any language is arbitrary, but a little experiment should make things
simpler. Just read my message:
%=&@ #82 873xxi uu ds auis sdu32 33409 fj
You understand this, do not you? I just use "arbitrary symbols"! So what...
it is unreadable? :)
Prev by Date:
Re: Mathematicas simplifications
Next by Date:
Re: Usage of #1
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Log[x]//TraditionalForm
Next by thread: