Re: Log[x]//TraditionalForm
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg96283] Re: Log[x]//TraditionalForm
- From: "slawek" <human at site.pl>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:16:44 -0500 (EST)
- References: <200902031132.GAA00303@smc.vnet.net> <7461949.1234000227010.JavaMail.root@m02> <gmp121$c7f$1@smc.vnet.net>
U¿ytkownik "David Park" <djmpark at comcast.net> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci news:gmp121$c7f$1 at smc.vnet.net... > Mathematical symbols are always arbitrary and the only important thing is > that a book or application make explicit the meaning of the symbols used. > And Mathematica does make clear how Log is used. Presumably, the reader or > user will know what he wants. Any language is arbitrary, but a little experiment should make things simpler. Just read my message: %=&@ #82 873xxi uu ds auis sdu32 33409 fj You understand this, do not you? I just use "arbitrary symbols"! So what... it is unreadable? :) slawek
- References:
- Log[x]//TraditionalForm
- From: "slawek" <human@site.pl>
- Log[x]//TraditionalForm