MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Looping

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg95991] Re: Looping
  • From: David Bailey <dave at>
  • Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:44:01 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <glmt16$mqu$> <> <glvk9h$e4d$>

Andrzej Kozlowski wrote:

> I doubt very much that they they ever get "stuck" in the way you  
> describe. Both Simplify and FullSimplify make use of algebraic  
> algorithms some of which have very high complexity (e.g. exponential  
> or even double exponential in the number of variables). 
> Andrzej Kozlowski

I was responding to a user who tells us he has left a calculation 
running for 3 days! He hadn't used TimeConstraint when he started the 
thing off, so it could not help him until he killed the process.

I have certainly had Simplify and FullSimplify get 'stuck' - though I 
have never waited 3 days for a possible answer (and I am yet to 
encounter this problem with 7.0, but I have not tried)!

In situations like this - which often spread over a lot of memory - the 
computer ends up swapping memory pages to/from disk, which slows the 
actual calculation to a crawl.

I would have thought I replied with the obvious practical advice, and 
that the word 'stuck' is sufficiently vague and informal as not to 
require a paragraph of mathematical caveats!


  • References:
    • Re: Looping
      • From: David Bailey <>
  • Prev by Date: Re: is there a itc chanel for mathematica?
  • Next by Date: Re: Re: Re: two y-axes with different scaling
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Looping
  • Next by thread: how to change default font of input style