Re: Re: Re: Is Orange translucent? - What
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg101432] Re: [mg101410] Re: [mg101386] Re: Is Orange translucent? - What
- From: peter lindsay <plindsay.0 at gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:06:25 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <30723579.1246246649561.JavaMail.root@n11>
I'd like to chip in with an unsolicited testimonial of my own:David Parks' "Presentations" package gives an extraordinary boost to the graphical capabilities of Mathematica. A small subset of examples using the Presentations package are shown at http://blackbook.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~Peter/djmpark/html/, and more info about it is found at David's own pages: http://home.comcast.net/~djmpark/DrawGraphicsPage.html I should also add that I am constantly amazed by the patience and generosity of people like David and Jens-Peer [ and many others ] in answering "newbie" questions from people like myself. We should also be thankful to the regular contributors from members of Wolfram who clearly keep an eye on developments in this group. Peter 2009/7/6 E. Martin-Serrano <eMartinSerrano at telefonica.net> > Mr. Park's approach to deal with graphics is not a commodity to advertise, > at all. I think it is a potential ease to use different paradigm to > (Mathematica) graphics instead. Easier by far. It goes far beyond plotting > lines and patching colors. It saves a lot of time. On the other hand, if > someone posts a question anyone is free to deliver what she/he thinks is a > suitable response. > > In my opinion that is all. > > > E. Martin-Serrano > > -----Original Message----- > From: TerryH [mailto:tlharter at verizon.net] > Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 11:43 AM > To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net > Subject: [mg101410] [mg101386] Re: Is Orange translucent? - What Methods > exist? > > AES wrote: > > In article <h2i4mb$91r$1 at smc.vnet.net>, > > Mariano Su=E1rez-Alvarez <mariano.suarezalvarez at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On Jul 1, 7:34 am, "David Park" <djmp... at comcast.net> wrote: > >>> The "AxesInFront" and "GridLinesInFront" options should be documented= > in > >>> Graphics. But should they be documented in every 2D plot type? That's > >>> probably a lot of work. It's one of the disadvantages of organizing t= > he > >>> graphics around set-piece plot types. > >>> > >>> David Park > >> Do you have to turn every one of your posts into an advertisment? :/ > >> > >> -- m > > > > Just for the record, I don't share the sentiment voiced in this post. > > > > I would also like to echo AES's comment. David Park brings a lot of > value-added content (especially Graphics related) to this newsgroup. I, > for one, value his postings. > > ......T.L. Harter, PhD >