MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Style for function calls?

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg97166] Re: Style for function calls?
  • From: magma <maderri2 at>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 05:40:04 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <goqpg6$lsb$>

I have not used ~ very much (if at all) myself, because many times it
can be more elegantly replaced by subvalue programming (operator[x_]
[y_]), but the @ technique is sometimes quite nice.

For example, let's say you have written a long function call with many
arguments and then you think you should do some operation on it.
You could use the postfix notation of course, but suppose your eye or
cursor is near the head of the function call.
Instead of trying to find the ending "]" (with your eyes or by triple
clicking) it might be faster and more natural to simply insert the new
operator with @ in front of the function call, where your mouse/eye
already is.
This might also make your code easier to read in the future.
After all using postfix notation is a bit like reading some long
sentences in German or Latin where the main verb is at the very end.
Unless you are a native speaker, you might find it a bit awkward.

  • Prev by Date: Re: Bug in Pattern Matching with Condition?
  • Next by Date: Re: Style for function calls?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Style for function calls?
  • Next by thread: Re: Style for function calls?