[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: Permanent Computation Efficiency
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg105369] Re: [mg105077] Re: Permanent Computation Efficiency
*From*: ?UTF-8?B?5a2Z5oy6?= <sunt05 at mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>
*Date*: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:09:12 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <200911181200.HAA04436@smc.vnet.net> <he372o$err$1@smc.vnet.net>
Thanks all same!
The community is so nice:)
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Leonid Shifrin <lshifr at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, I wouldn't explain it better than Daniel did, and I know far less
> about it than he does. Since Coefficient takes derivatives, it does not need
> to expand the product, but can use the product formula for derivatives -
> this is I guess the reason for its efficiency in this case.
>
> Regards,
> Leonid
>
>
>
>> Could you please tell me what combinatorial knowledge is in need to
>> understand the function Coefficient?
>>
>>
>
Prev by Date:
**Re: Re: to become {{f[a],g[a]},{f[b],g[b]},{f[c],g[c]}}**
Next by Date:
**Re: Using GraphPlot to draw an empty graph**
Previous by thread:
**Re: Permanent Computation Efficiency**
Next by thread:
**Re: Re: Fyi, Listing of Mathematica 7**
| |