MathGroup Archive 2009

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Opportunities and Player Pro

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg104396] Re: Opportunities and Player Pro
  • From: telefunkenvf14 <rgorka at>
  • Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:19:01 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <hcbi0f$jn9$>

On Oct 29, 2:59 am, "E. Martin-Serrano"
<eMartinSerr... at> wrote:
> I wish to join the opinion already expressed here on that WRI should provide
> the means to make available to people, in general, any products developed
> with Mathematica,  allowing to manipulate all or most of the dynamic
> graphics and other stuff in them. The lack of this free tool which would
> make possible wide distribution of these materials severely restricts the
> opportunities to use Mathematica for many purposes.
> It is true that Mathematica Player Pro is already available, and that it is
> the professional platform for running interactive Mathematica applications
> and documents and for interacting with reports and documents. It is also
> true that, Player Pro is an application delivery system and that it can
> be used to deliver tools, and so on. But, in the end, all this is
> restricted to a closed and, to certain extent, comparatively tiny community
> of already Player Pro users.
> But think about, say,  a book on some scientific and technical matter, meant
> to be distributed in many countries, written in Spanish, English, Russian,
> French, German, Arabic, Italian, Chinese, Japanese, and others. Let us
> suppose that it is an outstanding book targeted to a wide spectrum of
> persons and institutions: including academics, professionals, and students;
> plus people in general too.  And, let suppose that the authors are
> considering including in the book, as an addendum, the sort of dynamic
> graphics and some other computational material that Mathematica could
> provide.
> Taking apart the fact that some potential purchasers of the book would
> actually be current Mathematica users; does anyone really think that it
> makes any sense including Mathematica as an important tool for the project
> and tied it to a preexistent and closed community of already Player Pro
> users?
> I would really like to be in a situation of defending the Mathematica way
> since I believe it would be nearly the best one, both for readers (including
> students) and lecturers; but I cannot. It seems that for projects like this
> there is a long way to go yet.
> E. Martin-Serrano
> _________________________________________
> This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended
> solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive
> this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it.
> As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, E. Mart=EDn-Serrano
> liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although
> the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network,
> the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and
> will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.
> Este mensaje y los ficheros adjuntos pueden contener informacion
> confidencial
> destinada solamente a la(s) persona(s) mencionadas anteriormente
> pueden estar protegidos por secreto profesional.
> Si usted recibe este correo electronico por error, gracias por informar
> inmediatamente al remitente y destruir el mensaje.
> Al no estar asegurada la integridad de este mensaje sobre la red, E.
> Mart=EDn-Serrano no se hace responsable por su contenido. Su contenido no
> constituye ningun
> compromiso para el remitente, salvo ratificacion escrita por ambas partes.
> Aunque se esfuerza al maximo por mantener su red libre de virus, el emisor
> no puede garantizar nada al respecto y no sera responsable de cualesquier a
> da=F1os que puedan resultar de una transmision de virus.

I just wish WRI would provide me with the PlayerPro licenses promised
when I signed up for Premier service...

(Their response: Oh, well that's not included with *Student* premier
service. My reply: You don't make any such distiction prior to
purchasing premier service.)

Student buyers beware, I guess.


  • Prev by Date: Re: ToExpression[..,TexForm] does not seem to work on some Latex commands?
  • Next by Date: Re: Opportunities and Player Pro
  • Previous by thread: Re: Opportunities and Player Pro
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: Opportunities and Player Pro