MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Experimental`NumericalFunction::dimsl


You gave us NOTHING to work with. How can we guess the problem, without  
seeing the code?

Bobby

On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 02:50:07 -0500, Joe Hays <hays.joe at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> I'm stumped with an error code I'm getting from FindMinimum after it runs
> for over 7 minutes. Its,
>
> <snip>
> Experimental`NumericalFunction::dimsl: {-0.8} given in -0.8 should be a  
> list
> of dimensions for a particular argument.
>
> FindMinimum::dimsl: {-0.8} given in -0.7999999999999636` should be a  
> list of
> dimensions for a particular argument.
> </snip>
>
> This is all I'm given. There is no documentation on this error and it  
> seems
> odd that I'd get it so long after the function has already been  
> executing.
> So, I'm completely stumped...
>
> Any thoughts/advice would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Joe
>
>


-- 
DrMajorBob at yahoo.com


  • Prev by Date: Re: Experimental`NumericalFunction::dimsl
  • Next by Date: Re: Unevaluated functions
  • Previous by thread: Re: Experimental`NumericalFunction::dimsl
  • Next by thread: Re: Experimental`NumericalFunction::dimsl