MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg114955] Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8
  • From: Armand Tamzarian <mike.honeychurch at gmail.com>
  • Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:11:21 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <iepdi9$g2h$1@smc.vnet.net> <201012220736.CAA10472@smc.vnet.net> <iev2go$4j5$1@smc.vnet.net>

On Dec 23, 7:50 pm, Andrzej Kozlowski <a... at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote:
> On 22 Dec 2010, at 08:36, Armand Tamzarian wrote:
>
> > There was a thread recently about the standard of documentation. We
> > appreciate the enormity of the task of documenting functions but in
> > this case Wolfram clearly dropped the ball by including documentation
> > of functionality that doesn't exist.
>
> Well, given the choice between useful but undocumented features and
> fully documented but non-existent features, I have no doubt about my
> preference.
>
> Andrzej Kozlowski


Why frame it as a question of choice? Shouldn't you be aiming to
eliminate both? Both instances tend to waste users time. ...as we
already saw above from a post by Eric Brown.

Mike


  • Prev by Date: Re: Building clusters out of a nested list
  • Next by Date: Re: Building clusters out of a nested list
  • Previous by thread: Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8
  • Next by thread: Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8