MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8

On 24 Dec 2010, at 10:11, Armand Tamzarian wrote:

> On Dec 23, 7:50 pm, Andrzej Kozlowski <a... at> wrote:
>> On 22 Dec 2010, at 08:36, Armand Tamzarian wrote:
>>> There was a thread recently about the standard of documentation. We
>>> appreciate the enormity of the task of documenting functions but in
>>> this case Wolfram clearly dropped the ball by including =
>>> of functionality that doesn't exist.
>> Well, given the choice between useful but undocumented features and
>> fully documented but non-existent features, I have no doubt about my
>> preference.
>> Andrzej Kozlowski
> Why frame it as a question of choice? Shouldn't you be aiming to
> eliminate both? Both instances tend to waste users time. we
> already saw above from a post by Eric Brown.
> Mike

Well, I guess this (sort of) proves that these irritating "emoticons" =
are sometimes really needed... Sigh.



  • Prev by Date: Re: Fixing padding inside Inset
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica 8 & reports / books
  • Previous by thread: Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8
  • Next by thread: Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8