|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8
On 24 Dec 2010, at 10:11, Armand Tamzarian wrote:
> On Dec 23, 7:50 pm, Andrzej Kozlowski <a... at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote:
>> On 22 Dec 2010, at 08:36, Armand Tamzarian wrote:
>>
>>> There was a thread recently about the standard of documentation. We
>>> appreciate the enormity of the task of documenting functions but in
>>> this case Wolfram clearly dropped the ball by including =
documentation
>>> of functionality that doesn't exist.
>>
>> Well, given the choice between useful but undocumented features and
>> fully documented but non-existent features, I have no doubt about my
>> preference.
>>
>> Andrzej Kozlowski
>
>
> Why frame it as a question of choice? Shouldn't you be aiming to
> eliminate both? Both instances tend to waste users time. ...as we
> already saw above from a post by Eric Brown.
>
> Mike
>
Well, I guess this (sort of) proves that these irritating "emoticons" =
are sometimes really needed... Sigh.
Andrzej
=
Prev by Date:
Re: Fixing padding inside Inset
Next by Date:
Re: Mathematica 8 & reports / books
Previous by thread:
Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8
Next by thread:
Re: bibtex support in Mathematica 8
|
