MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?


Thanks Daniel for the info.

How does one "design a new operator" which Simplify could use as an 
assumption. I'm a Mathematica newby, so please excuse my ignorance.

Thanks again,

Dave

dh wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> << does not have a meaning in mathematica. It is only a symbol. 
> Therefore your expression is not simplified.
> You may define a new operator for your purposes.
> Daniel
>
> dbird wrote:
>> Please excuse if this has been answered before, but I can't find it.
>>
>> Is there some way to do a Simplify with assumptions using a 
>> NestedLessLess or something similar? For example:
>>
>> d=a+b
>> Simplify[d,NestedLessLess[a,b]]
>>
>> Answer is:
>> a+b
>>
>> Answer should be:
>> b
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Dave
>>
>
>
>


  • Prev by Date: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?
  • Next by Date: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?
  • Next by thread: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?