MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?


I completely agree with you here. This has been an eye-opener for me. 
Such an ordinarily trivial operation done so often, both in engineering 
and physics, is anything but trivial in it's implications...

Dave

DrMajorBob wrote:
> for some value of the word "work". (I don't think you've defined, 
> precisely, what you're looking for.)
>
> <snip>
>
>> This works for the test expression, obviously. But, can it be made to 
>> work for a more complex expression containing say a radical?
>>
>


  • Prev by Date: Re: Testing Mathematica Expressions?
  • Next by Date: Initialization problem in a DynamicModule
  • Previous by thread: Re: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?
  • Next by thread: Re: Simplify with NestedLessLess?