|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg110965] Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
- From: juan flores <juanfie at gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 05:36:50 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <i199b4$q1u$1@smc.vnet.net> <i1c5un$cft$1@smc.vnet.net>
Dear Roman,
How'bout posting your final solution?. Just for the record.
About the number of bug reports, I think it will increase with the
number of bugs, independent of the type of license you publish it
under.
Regards,
Juan
On Jul 12, 6:21 am, Roman <rschm... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks to all! Indeed a combination of Locked, ReadProtected, and
> Encode do the job.
> Now the question is: as I work in academic scientific research, would
> I get more bug reports and patch suggestions if I published my package
> under the GPL instead of encoded?
> Thanks for any advice you have on this topic!
> Roman.
Prev by Date:
Re: Restricting file type with SystemDialogInput
Next by Date:
Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
Previous by thread:
Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
Next by thread:
Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
|