MathGroup Archive 2010

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg110965] Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
  • From: juan flores <juanfie at gmail.com>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 05:36:50 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <i199b4$q1u$1@smc.vnet.net> <i1c5un$cft$1@smc.vnet.net>

Dear Roman,

How'bout posting your final solution?.  Just for the record.

About the number of bug reports, I think it will increase with the
number of bugs, independent of the type of license you publish it
under.

Regards,

Juan


On Jul 12, 6:21 am, Roman <rschm... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks to all! Indeed a combination of Locked, ReadProtected, and
> Encode do the job.
> Now the question is: as I work in academic scientific research, would
> I get more bug reports and patch suggestions if I published my package
> under the GPL instead of encoded?
> Thanks for any advice you have on this topic!
> Roman.



  • Prev by Date: Re: Restricting file type with SystemDialogInput
  • Next by Date: Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
  • Previous by thread: Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
  • Next by thread: Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form