|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg110948] Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
- From: Bill Rowe <readnews at sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 05:27:21 -0400 (EDT)
On 7/12/10 at 7:21 AM, rschmied at gmail.com (Roman) wrote:
>Thanks to all! Indeed a combination of Locked, ReadProtected, and
>Encode do the job. Now the question is: as I work in academic
>scientific research, would I get more bug reports and patch
>suggestions if I published my package under the GPL instead of
>encoded?
My guess is the rate at which you get bug reports isn't very
dependent on whether the package is published under GPL or
encoded. I would think it would depend more on how easy it is to
submit bug reports and whether your users expect to benefit from
submitting bug reports.
Prev by Date:
Primitive Disk Gradient Fills in Graphics
Next by Date:
Re: Stem and Leaf Question
Previous by thread:
Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
Next by thread:
Re: deploying a package in human-unreadable form
|