|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: pattern bugs and comment on intuitive syntax for the New Year
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg115164] Re: pattern bugs and comment on intuitive syntax for the New Year
- From: Armand Tamzarian <mike.honeychurch at gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 03:56:07 -0500 (EST)
- References: <ifpk7u$bsg$1@smc.vnet.net>
On Jan 2, 9:32 pm, Richard Fateman <fate... at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Guess the results.
>
> x+3 /. x+c___ -> aha[c]
> x /. x+c___ -> aha[c]
> x /. x+c___:0 -> aha[c]
>
> compare to
>
> x+y+3 /. x+y+c___ -> aha[c]
> x+y /. x+y+c___ -> aha[c]
> x+y /. x+y+c___:0 -> aha[c]
> x+y+a+b /. x+y+c___ :> aha[c]
> x+y+a+b /. x+y+c___ :> aha[Plus[c]]
> x+y /. x+y+c___ :> aha[Plus[c]]
>
> I think the requirement for the :0 represents a bug. Maybe the
> need for the Plus[], too. The treatment of NullSequences within
> a Flat operator could be different, leaving an operator around.
>
> ............
>
> Another item. really, syntax.
>
> define
>
> GreaterThan[q_]:= #>q&
> gt2=GreaterThan[2] (* a function of one argument.
> is that argument > 2? =
*)
>
> mm[2, 10] /. mm[q_, s_?GreaterThan[q]] :> aha[q, s]
>
> doesn't give aha..
>
> mm[2, 10] /. mm[q_, s_?gt2] :> aha[q, s]
>
> does give aha
>
> this works, though.
> mm[2, 10] /. mm[q_, s_?(GreaterThan[q])] :> aha[q, s]
Not with version 8 on Mac OS X 10.6.5 ...but I didn't expect it to.
The syntax coloring should indicate why.
>
> I love that intuitive syntax. None of that excess
> parentheses and stuff. (sarcasm)
All you had to do is try these to lines:
mm[2, 10] /. mm[q_, s_?(# > 2 &)] :> aha[q, s] (works)
mm[2, 10] /. mm[q_, s_?# > 2 &] :> aha[q, s] (doesn't work, nor should
it be expected to work)
mm[2, 10] /. mm[q_, s_?(# > q &)] :> aha[q, s] (doesn't work, nor
should it be expected to work)
>
> This error would have been
> much more apparent in Lisp.
It is also much more apparent when you read the documentation about
the precedence of "?"
>
> happy new year.
thanks
Prev by Date:
Re: Import, ReadList, and Unicode
Next by Date:
Re: Trial version of Mathematica 8 restrictions and a
Previous by thread:
pattern bugs and comment on intuitive syntax for the New Year
Next by thread:
Re: pattern bugs and comment on intuitive syntax for the New Year
|