|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: ExampleData[{"Geometry3D", "Torus"}]
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg120443] Re: ExampleData[{"Geometry3D", "Torus"}]
- From: Heike Gramberg <heike.gramberg at gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:47:12 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <201107220106.VAA16736@smc.vnet.net>
I'm not familiar with Torus[] but another option might be to use
RevolutionPlot3D, i.e.
torus[r1_, r2_] :=
RevolutionPlot3D[{r1 + r2 Cos[t], 0, r2 Sin[t]}, {t, 0, 2 Pi},
Mesh -> False, PlotPoints -> 60, Boxed -> False, Axes -> False]
torus[1, 0.5]
Heike
On 22 Jul 2011, at 02:06, Joseph O'Rourke wrote:
> Thanks, Oliver. I know how to make a torus via ParametricPlot3D[],
and by using the deprecated Torus[] function. I was wondering if
ExampleData[] could be adjusted so that one would have the same control
as with the old Torus[] function. The reason I wanted this is that the
torus produced by ExampleData[] looks much nicer than that produced by
Torus[]. Or, at least, I cannot get the latter to look as smooth when
rendered as the former. But maybe I should just use ParametricPlot3D[]
with Mehs->None as you suggest. Thanks again for your attention.
>
Prev by Date:
Re: How Can I Include a Button in a Manipulate
Next by Date:
Re: Producing an image that only contains its interior and boundary but, no exterior.
Previous by thread:
Re: ExampleData[{"Geometry3D", "Torus"}]
Next by thread:
Re: ExampleData[{"Geometry3D", "Torus"}]
|