Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Taking the Arg of a complex number

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg122164] Re: Taking the Arg of a complex number
  • From: Ben Gear <bjgear at googlemail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 08:10:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • References: <j73grj$fvk$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: comp.soft-sys.math.mathematica at googlegroups.com

Thanks all for the replies.

Simon's answer seems the most satisfying, interesting that a 'FullSimplify' is required. Refine and Simplify don't cut it (still not 100% how these three differ). I was also being a bit thick about the range of phi I was using.  Getting an answer of ArcTan[Cos[phi], Sin[phi]] also makes sense when the range of phi is not defined.

To those who have suggested that the issue was due to Arg[z] not being evaluated unless z is numeric, as stated in the documentation - this was my first thought, however I think this means that Arg['symbolic variable'] can't be evaluated (which makes sense), rather than Arg['symbolic expression'] can't be evaluated.

Regards,

Ben



  • Prev by Date: Re: How to create this kind of list
  • Next by Date: Re: Levene and BrownForsythe Tests
  • Previous by thread: Re: Taking the Arg of a complex number
  • Next by thread: Plot function with two arguments