Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2011

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg121560] Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining
  • From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • References: <201109160946.FAA12301@smc.vnet.net> <j4vana$dal$1@smc.vnet.net>

On 16/09/2011 12:08, Oliver Ruebenkoenig wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, DmitryG wrote:
>
>> Here is a program with (* Definition of the equations *) made one-
>> step, that performs the same as in my previous post....................

I tried pasting your example into Mathematica, but unfortunately there 
seems to be a variable 'x' which is undefined - presumably some input 
data. It might be worth posting a complete example, so that people can 
explore how to get decent performance.

Error:

Part::partd: "Part specification x[[1]] is longer than depth of object."

David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk




  • Prev by Date: Artistic impression of cloudy structures
  • Next by Date: Re: Changing excel table with Wolfram Mathematica
  • Previous by thread: Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining
  • Next by thread: Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining