[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining

• To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
• Subject: [mg121560] Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining
• From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
• Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:07:41 -0400 (EDT)
• Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
• References: <201109160946.FAA12301@smc.vnet.net> <j4vana$dal$1@smc.vnet.net>

On 16/09/2011 12:08, Oliver Ruebenkoenig wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, DmitryG wrote:
>
>> Here is a program with (* Definition of the equations *) made one-
>> step, that performs the same as in my previous post....................

I tried pasting your example into Mathematica, but unfortunately there 
seems to be a variable 'x' which is undefined - presumably some input 
data. It might be worth posting a complete example, so that people can 
explore how to get decent performance.

Error:

Part::partd: "Part specification x[[1]] is longer than depth of object."

David Bailey
http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk

• References:
  • Re: Compilation: Avoiding inlining
    • From: DmitryG <einschlag@gmail.com>