|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: is there internal variable like $0 in perl?
So you really just wanted the string? There isn't any automatic
variable I know of that you can use for that purpose.
On Apr 26, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Ted Sariyski wrote:
> I missed to mention that I use "me" for primitive debugging .e.g.
> Print[me, ...].
> --Ted
>
> On 4/26/2012 8:38 AM, Sseziwa Mukasa wrote:
>> Ted,
>>
>> It's not necessary in this case, any references to myFun in the
Module are scoped to the package aaa already as long as myFun's
declaration is after the Begin[], which I can't tell since you elided
code.
>>
>> If you are using anonymous functions #0 refers to the function itself
and can be used for recursive anonymous functions.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ssezi
>>
>> On Apr 26, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Ted Sariyski wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When I define a new function myFun in a package aaa` I define a variable
>>> me="aaa`myFun".
>>>
>>> BeginPackage["aaa`"]
>>> ...
>>> myFun[]:=Module[{..., me="aaa`myFun"},
>>> ...
>>>
>>> I wonder Is there an automatic variable, like $0 in perl, which
>>> internally is assigned "aaa`myFun"?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> --Ted
>>>
>
Prev by Date:
Re: is there internal variable like $0 in perl?
Next by Date:
LinearModelFit doesn't work with constraints?
Previous by thread:
Re: is there internal variable like $0 in perl?
Next by thread:
Re: how to check for NumericQ arbitrary data structure
|
