|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Typesetting built-in functions without evaluating
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg126404] Re: Typesetting built-in functions without evaluating
- From: Brentt <brenttnewman at gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 04:08:58 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- References: <CAFJC7XqOJE+wKdxKny7p65mO7_FHz1zBOvxv2xON2QjFSD5PHw@mail.gmail.com>
I was able to answer my own question. I discovered Defer.
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Brentt <brenttnewman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, I've been wrestling with mathematica trying to get it to typeset a
> partial derivative in traditiaonal form without evaluating it. The closest
> I've been able to come is having it output
>
> in[1]:=D[x,y] //TraditionalForm
> out[2]:=Hold[ *typesetted partial derivative here* ]
>
> So I can get the unevaluated partial derivative notation to output, but I
> can't do it without having the "Hold" mucking it up. How might one go about
> this? I've tried all kinds of complicated schemes, and I'm sure I could
> hack together some sort of output form that looks like a pd but that is
> actually not. But I figure there has to be a simpler solution that I'm
> missing.
>
> Also I've tried setting D to HoldAll. It doesn't work for some reason and
> I'm not sure why? Evaluation order is still a dark art to me despite having
> read that portion of the manual a few times (in my defense I'm not the
> sharpest tool in the shed).
>
Prev by Date:
NDSolve solutions
Next by Date:
Re: Question about Initialization Cells
Previous by thread:
Re: Typesetting built-in functions without evaluating
Next by thread:
Re: Typesetting built-in functions without evaluating
|