Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg128678] Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?
- From: Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu>
- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 01:51:55 -0500 (EST)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <k7p3j3$ca3$1@smc.vnet.net> <20121112080708.39931690E@smc.vnet.net> <k7skt2$ku3$1@smc.vnet.net> <20121114062826.C02FC69AC@smc.vnet.net> <6F6D7B27-201F-4AC9-9553-809ABA30A7CE@mimuw.edu.pl> <9488D537-DAE3-45F6-A088-38486CB999AB@math.umass.edu> <20121115085735.202336A1D@smc.vnet.net> <3AA0624E-54D6-4BBD-8320-A47ED2838A75@mimuw.edu.pl>
On Nov 15, 2012, at 4:45 AM, Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 15 Nov 2012, at 09:57, Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 14 Nov 2012, at 22:01, Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 14, 2012, at 5:39 AM, Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 14 Nov 2012, at 07:28, Richard Fateman <fateman at cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/12/2012 9:13 PM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the empty interval in Mathematica:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interval[{1, 0}]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Resolve[Exists[x, IntervalMemberQ[Interval[{1, 0}], x]]]
>>>>>> False
>>>>>>
>>>>> Apparently this doesn't mean what you think it does. It gives the same
>>>>> answer for Interval[{0,1}].
>>>>
>>>> Of course that is because
>>>>
>>>> IntervalMemberQ[Interval[{0, 1}], x]
>>>>
>>>> False
>>>
>>> What remains surprising to me is:
>>>
>>> Resolve[Exists[x, x \[Element] Reals, IntervalMemberQ[Interval[{0, 1}], x]]]
>>> False
>>>
>>
>> I don't find it surprising.
>> All you are doing is, evaluating Exists[x,Element[x,Reals],False] which is False and then Resolve[False] which is also False.The fact that IntervalMemberQ[Interval[{0, 1}], x] immediately evaluates to False (unlike, for example, 0<x<1, which evaluates to itself) is responsible for this and shows that IntervalMemberQ is not intended to be used in symbolic expressions. Compare this with
>>
>> Resolve[Exists[x, x \[Element] Reals, 0 < x < 1]]
>>
>> True
>>
> Maybe the following example will make my point clearer.
>
> Compare:
>
> Resolve[Exists[x, Element[x, Primes]]]
>
> True
>
> with
>
> Resolve[Exists[x, PrimeQ[x]]]
>
> False
>
> Mathematica `predicates (functions ending with Q) always evaluate immediately to True or False and thus are generally unsuitable for use in symbolic expressions of the above kind.
OK, that provides an explanation of sorts. In fact, the documentation of PrimeQ makes the distinction in saying, "Simplify[expr\[Element]Primes] can be used to try to determine whether a symbolic expression is mathematically a prime."
But the documentation for IntervalMemberQ does not say any such thing. Moreover, one might be misled into thinking
Simplify[0.5 \[Element] Interval[{0, 1}]]
should return True, but it returns 0.5 \[Element] Interval[{0, 1}] instead.
Is the general rule about functions whose names end with Q documented somewhere?
---
Murray Eisenberg
murray at math.umass.edu
Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
Lederle Graduate Research Tower phone 413 549-1020 (H)
University of Massachusetts 413 545-2838 (W)
710 North Pleasant Street fax 413 545-1801
Amherst, MA 01003-9305
- References:
- Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?
- From: Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu>
- Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?
- From: Richard Fateman <fateman@cs.berkeley.edu>
- Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?
- From: Andrzej Kozlowski <akozlowski@gmail.com>
- Re: Relational operators on intervals: bug?