MathGroup Archive 2012

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Exact Schur Decomposition

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg128175] Re: Exact Schur Decomposition
  • From: Sseziwa Mukasa <mukasa at gmail.com>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 04:13:24 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20120920042627.1724B6866@smc.vnet.net>

Unfortunately the implementation in Mathematica is for numerical 
matrices only as the help text states:

SchurDecomposition[m]
yields the Schur decomposition for a numerical matrix m,...

On Sep 20, 2012, at 12:26 AM, Geoffrey Eisenbarth wrote:

> Anyone know of a work around to get exact matrices out of the 
SchurDecomposition command? Unfortunately, when I pass an integer matrix 
through the command, it gives an infinite precision error. I know I can 
run the matrix through the numerical N[] command before I pass it to 
SchurDecomposition[], but I'd like to be able to get the exact unitary 
and upper triangular matrices which decompose a given matrix. Any 
thoughts on a work around, or is this futile?
>





  • Prev by Date: Re: while loop through a list
  • Next by Date: Re: Kernel exits (for lack of memory)
  • Previous by thread: Exact Schur Decomposition
  • Next by thread: Does FindCurvePath work?