|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Exact Schur Decomposition
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg128175] Re: Exact Schur Decomposition
- From: Sseziwa Mukasa <mukasa at gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 04:13:24 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <20120920042627.1724B6866@smc.vnet.net>
Unfortunately the implementation in Mathematica is for numerical
matrices only as the help text states:
SchurDecomposition[m]
yields the Schur decomposition for a numerical matrix m,...
On Sep 20, 2012, at 12:26 AM, Geoffrey Eisenbarth wrote:
> Anyone know of a work around to get exact matrices out of the
SchurDecomposition command? Unfortunately, when I pass an integer matrix
through the command, it gives an infinite precision error. I know I can
run the matrix through the numerical N[] command before I pass it to
SchurDecomposition[], but I'd like to be able to get the exact unitary
and upper triangular matrices which decompose a given matrix. Any
thoughts on a work around, or is this futile?
>
Prev by Date:
Re: while loop through a list
Next by Date:
Re: Kernel exits (for lack of memory)
Previous by thread:
Exact Schur Decomposition
Next by thread:
Does FindCurvePath work?
|