Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2013

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Re: Mathematica integration Vs Sympy

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg130571] Re: [mg130564] Re: Mathematica integration Vs Sympy
  • From: Alex Krasnov <akrasnov at eecs.berkeley.edu>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 03:11:28 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20130420094229.B63996A64@smc.vnet.net> <20130421091626.26FB96AC3@smc.vnet.net>

In this case, the results are valid for a=1 in the sense of a limit, as 
Limit[u, a -> 1] and limit(u, a, 1) demonstrate. This is not always the 
case. Example:

In:	f = Integrate[x^n, x]
Out:	x^(1 + n)/(1 + n)

In:	Limit[f, n -> -1, Direction -> 1]
Out:	-Infinity

In:	Limit[f, n -> -1, Direction -> -1]
Out:	Infinity

Alex


On Sun, 21 Apr 2013, Brentt wrote:

>
> The result:
>
> In[0]: Integrate[1/(x*(1 - a*(1 - x))), x]
> Out[0]: (Log[1 + a (-1 + x)] - Log[x])/(-1 + a)
>
> Seems to be true for all complex a and x . Why do you think it assumes a>1?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Sergio R <sergiorquestion at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>>    Just for fun a put an integral I was doing via mathematica
>> WolframAlpha
>> [
>> http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Integrate[1%2F%28x*%281-a*%281-x%29%29%29%2Cx]
>> ]
>> into the online sympy [ http://live.sympy.org/ ] console
>> the following:
>>
>> a = Symbol('a'); g = 1/(x*(1-a*(1-x))) ; u=simplify(integrate(g,x))
>>
>> Then, to display the result, at the sympy ">>>" prompt, type u
>> and hit return.
>>
>>   To my surprise,  sympy seems to give the right result without any
>> assumption, while mathematica's result seems to assume a>1, which is
>> not specified. Also for this case (a>1) sympy gives an extra constant
>> which is not present in the mathematica result.
>>
>> Is there a way to make mathematica to output a general result like
>> sympy
>> in this case?
>>
>> Sergio
>>
>>
>
>



  • Prev by Date: cannot work a "conditional If"
  • Next by Date: Re: cannot work a "conditional If"
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica integration Vs Sympy
  • Next by thread: integral of x^n