Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2013

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: updating a simulation within Manipulate.

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg130090] Re: updating a simulation within Manipulate.
  • From: Waclaw Kusnierczyk <waku at idi.ntnu.no>
  • Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 16:46:48 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20130308035142.51AD66799@smc.vnet.net> <5139E091.8000909@idi.ntnu.no> <5BBB104C-71B2-4AAA-9076-12DD94A35694@MIT.EDU>

On 03/08/2013 02:30 PM, W Craig Carter wrote:
> Thanks Waclwaw,
> That is informative; I'm going to have to read the docs about ScheduledTask[]s.
>
> My "real" example is quite a bit more involved---I have a Manipulate buried inside a Manipulate.  I am not looking at random walks per se, but that was an example I cooked up which was simple enough to illustrate my question.  I think this is the preferred method for asking questions in the group? (As long as one doesn't make the silly typos that I am prone to..).

Yes, I'd say reproducible, representative examples with all that's 
necessary but nothing that's not are the best way to illustrate 
questions -- and get responses.

Best,
vQ



  • Prev by Date: Re: updating a simulation within Manipulate.
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica 9 install
  • Previous by thread: Re: updating a simulation within Manipulate.
  • Next by thread: Re: updating a simulation within Manipulate.