MathGroup Archive 2013

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Mathematica and MacOSX 10.9 Mavericks

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg131927] Re: Mathematica and MacOSX 10.9 Mavericks
  • From: George Woodrow III <georgevw3 at mac.com>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 23:45:55 -0400 (EDT)
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-outx@smc.vnet.net
  • Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsendx@smc.vnet.net
  • References: <20131028044028.9FF1C6A1C@smc.vnet.net>

Just tested Mathematica 9.0.1 with OS X 10.9 and whatever Java was installed. No problems I can see. J/Link loads (J/Link version 4.4.0) but since I don't use J/Link, I can't test further.



george woodrow

On Oct 30, 2013, at 12:20 AM, David Latin <d.latin at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I am thinking of upgrading soon, but am led to believe from Web discussions
> that Mathematica 9 will not run with Java 7 (under OS X 10.6.8), but only
> the Apple-provided Java 6 (some have reported having to uninstall Java 7
> and go back to Java 6).
> Also, I run FireFox and for some time the Java 6 applet plug-in has been
> reported as "vulnerable" and requiring upgrade to Java 7.  But this
> requires upgrading OS X.
>
> Can someone from Wolfram please clarify if Mathematica 9 will definitely
> run with Java 7 ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> On 29 October 2013 10:27, Murray Eisenberg <murray at math.umass.edu> wrote:
>
>> I haven't seen any incompatibilities or surprises with Mathematica 9.0.1
>> under OS X 10.9 (Mavericks). After upgrade from OS X 10.8.5 to 10.9, I can
>> say of that the existing installation of Mathematica: it just works.
>>
>>
>> On Oct 28, 2013, at 12:40 AM, Raul Martinez <j.r.martinez at mac.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I use Mathematica 9 on a MacBookPro currently running MacOS X 10.8.5
>> (Mountain Lion).
>>>
>>> Yesterday, Apple released MacOS X 10.9 (Mavericks).
>>>
>>> Has anyone tried to run Mathematica 9 using Mavericks? If so, did you
>> encounter problems or was it a seamless update?
>>
>> ---
>> Murray Eisenberg
>> murray at math.umass.edu
>> Mathematics & Statistics Dept.
>> Lederle Graduate Research Tower
>> University of Massachusetts
>> 710 North Pleasant Street
>> Amherst, MA 01003-9305
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>




  • Prev by Date: Re: Mathematica not IEEE-754 compliant?
  • Next by Date: Re: Mathematica and MacOSX 10.9 Mavericks
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica and MacOSX 10.9 Mavericks
  • Next by thread: Re: Mathematica and MacOSX 10.9 Mavericks