RE: Mathematica 4.2 Benchmarks?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg36384] RE: [mg36362] Mathematica 4.2 Benchmarks?
- From: "DrBob" <drbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 02:56:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-to: <drbob at bigfoot.com>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Here's my output on a Gateway 700XL, 2.2GHz Pentium 4, 1024MB RAM, Windows XP Home. My clockspeed is considerably faster but the benchmark isn't, so I suspect AMD and Linux are on your side! I've been thinking about moving to Linux, and this makes me think even more. "Version = ""4.2 for Microsoft Windows (June 5, 2002)" "Times = "{1.25, 1.297, 1.2969999999999997, 0.4060000000000006, 0.9219999999999997, 1.5780000000000003, 0.75, 0.7809999999999997, 0.3130000000000006, 0.0779999999999994, 0.3119999999999994, 0.75, 0.8130000000000006, 1.1869999999999994, 1.4690000000000012} "Total Kernel Time = "13.203", Total Time = "14. "Benchmark = "6.869748851775977 Bobby Treat -----Original Message----- From: Armin Roehrl [mailto:armin at xss.de] To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net Subject: [mg36384] [mg36362] Mathematica 4.2 Benchmarks? Hi, Does anybody have Benchmarks for Mathematica 4.2 to share? If possible the same or similar machine and different OSes. I want to see how fast/slow the Linux version is compared to the Windows version. I tried http://www2.staff.fh-vorarlberg.ac.at/~ku/karl/timings40.html on a 1600 AMD Linux box with 512MB of RAM and got a value of 6.4. ---more details-- "Times = "\[InvisibleSpace]{1.18, 1.14, 1.08, 0.55, 1.18, 2.48, 0.74, 0.79, 0.41, 0.11, 0.38, 0.96, 0.97, 1.26, 1.11} "Total Kernel Time = "\[InvisibleSpace]14.34\[InvisibleSpace]", Total Time = \ "\[InvisibleSpace]17. "Benchmark = "\[InvisibleSpace]6.40784 ------------------------------------------------ I would like to see how Mathematica 4.2 improved in speed compared to Mathematica 4 or 3. Thanks a lot, Armin