RE: Mathematica 4.2 Benchmarks?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg36384] RE: [mg36362] Mathematica 4.2 Benchmarks?
- From: "DrBob" <drbob at bigfoot.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 02:56:41 -0400 (EDT)
- Reply-to: <drbob at bigfoot.com>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
Here's my output on a Gateway 700XL, 2.2GHz Pentium 4, 1024MB RAM,
Windows XP Home. My clockspeed is considerably faster but the benchmark
isn't, so I suspect AMD and Linux are on your side! I've been thinking
about moving to Linux, and this makes me think even more.
"Version = ""4.2 for Microsoft Windows (June 5, 2002)"
"Times = "{1.25, 1.297,
1.2969999999999997,
0.4060000000000006,
0.9219999999999997,
1.5780000000000003, 0.75,
0.7809999999999997,
0.3130000000000006,
0.0779999999999994,
0.3119999999999994, 0.75,
0.8130000000000006,
1.1869999999999994,
1.4690000000000012}
"Total Kernel Time = "13.203", Total Time = "14.
"Benchmark = "6.869748851775977
Bobby Treat
-----Original Message-----
From: Armin Roehrl [mailto:armin at xss.de]
To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
Subject: [mg36384] [mg36362] Mathematica 4.2 Benchmarks?
Hi,
Does anybody have Benchmarks for Mathematica 4.2 to share?
If possible the same or similar machine and different OSes.
I want to see how fast/slow the Linux version is compared
to the Windows version.
I tried
http://www2.staff.fh-vorarlberg.ac.at/~ku/karl/timings40.html
on a 1600 AMD Linux box with 512MB of RAM and got a
value of 6.4.
---more details--
"Times = "\[InvisibleSpace]{1.18, 1.14, 1.08, 0.55, 1.18, 2.48,
0.74,
0.79, 0.41, 0.11, 0.38, 0.96, 0.97, 1.26, 1.11}
"Total Kernel Time = "\[InvisibleSpace]14.34\[InvisibleSpace]", Total
Time = \
"\[InvisibleSpace]17.
"Benchmark = "\[InvisibleSpace]6.40784
------------------------------------------------
I would like to see how Mathematica 4.2 improved in speed
compared to Mathematica 4 or 3.
Thanks a lot,
Armin