MathGroup Archive 2006

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: simple antiderivative

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg68114] Re: simple antiderivative
  • From: Jean-Marc Gulliet <jeanmarc.gulliet at gmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 05:52:22 -0400 (EDT)
  • Organization: The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
  • References: <ea1nh0$pjt$1@smc.vnet.net>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

T Harris wrote:
> Hello, I am a beginner with Mathematica and I am wrapping up Calculus 1 
> right now.  Here is my question.
> 
> I am doing antiderivatives and tried to check one I did and can't get my
> handworked answer which is correct by the solution manual to match 
> Mathematica's
> answer.  I copied and pasted everything here so it looks weird until you
> paste it back in notebook.
> 
> Here is my input copied and pasted;
> 
> \!\(Integrate[8 x - 3\ \(Sec\^2\)[x], x]\)
> 
> My output is :
> 
> \!\(\[Integral]\((8\ x - 3\ \(Sec\^2\)[x])\) \[DifferentialD]x\)
> 
> Why don't I get the answer below as I do when I do it by hand?  The
> antiderivative of Sec^2 is Tan.  I am puzzled by the output mathematica
> gives.
> 
> \!\(4  x\^2 - 3\ Tan\ [x]\)
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> T Harris 
> 

You must not separate the head of a function from its argument. 
Therefore, write Sec[x]^(2) instead of Sec^(2)[x]. For instance,

Integrate[8x-3 Sec[x]^(2),x]

returns

    2
4 x  - 3 Tan[x]

as expected.

Regards,
Jean-Marc


  • Prev by Date: Re: Quaternion problem--> Jacobian derivation/ Metric
  • Next by Date: Re: (correction) pattern sequences
  • Previous by thread: Re: simple antiderivative
  • Next by thread: Re: simple antiderivative