Re: A new FrontEnd
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg128002] Re: A new FrontEnd
- From: David Bailey <dave at removedbailey.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 03:08:28 -0400 (EDT)
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@mail-archive0.wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: l-mathgroup@wolfram.com
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newout@smc.vnet.net
- Delivered-to: mathgroup-newsend@smc.vnet.net
- References: <k2ccrq$f1i$1@smc.vnet.net>
On 07/09/2012 09:56, Bill Rowe wrote: > On 9/5/12 at 3:07 AM, rodrigomurtax at gmail.com (Murta) wrote: > >> 1- More Undo! (1 Undo is a shame) > > The key issue here is what a multiple level undo would undo. If > the thought is simply to be able to undo text typed into the > front end with no attempt to undo computations or concern > regarding variable state reflect the result of undoing changes > to text input, that is one thing. But to have variable state, > computations etc reflect the undone changes to text input is > quite something else and probably not possible to do in general. > An undo that had a side effect of removing all computations would be of use to me. It is normally the text and input cells that matter. > > A better debugger might be useful to me. > Have you tried my (free) DebugTrace package? It doesn't use the Workbench, and it will operate on really badly structured code. David Bailey http://www.dbaileyconsultancy.co.uk