[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg55823] Re: [mg55802] DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?
*From*: DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
*Date*: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 05:10:02 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <200504060711.DAA13652@smc.vnet.net>
*Reply-to*: drbob at bigfoot.com
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
> I realize that (1 + I)/sqrt(2) is in the same direction as (1 + I),
> but why did Mathematica change it to the more 'strange' form?
Because directions have unit length.
Norm[(1 + I)/Sqrt[2]]
1
DirectedInfinity[2 + I*3]
First[%]
Norm[%]
DirectedInfinity[(2 + 3*I)/Sqrt[13]]
(2 + 3*I)/Sqrt[13]
1
Bobby
On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 03:11:59 -0400 (EDT), Matt <anonmous69 at netscape.net> wrote:
> Hello,
> This isn't particularly important probably, however, I am trying to
> learn as much about Mathematica as possible, and I thought this might
> shed some light on a 'Why Mathematica does this or that' principle.
>
> I'm working my way through 'The Mathematica Guidebook for
> Programming' and on page 177, he gives an example as follows:
>
> In[39]:= DirectedInfinity[1 + I] DirectedInfinity[I]
> Out[39]:= DirectedInfinity[-(1 - I)/sqrt(2)]
>
> That puzzled me a bit, so I decided to see what Mathematica would do
> with just the first part:
>
> In[40]:= DirectedInfinity[1 + I]
> Out[40]:= DirectedInfinity[(1 + I)/sqrt(2)]
>
> I realize that (1 + I)/sqrt(2) is in the same direction as (1 + I), but
> why did Mathematica change it to the more 'strange' form?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
--
DrBob at bigfoot.com
Prev by Date:
**Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?**
Next by Date:
**Re: How do I remove operator status?**
Previous by thread:
**DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?**
Next by thread:
**Re: DirectedInfinity[1 + I], why does it get replaced by (1 + I)/(sqrt(2) ?**
| |