Re: FrameTicks bug (SUMMARY)
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg58654] Re: FrameTicks bug (SUMMARY)
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 05:21:37 -0400 (EDT)
- Organization: Stanford University
- References: <200507102051.QAA14639@smc.vnet.net> <data6j$mep$1@smc.vnet.net>
- Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
On 7/10/05, I wrote:
> > Well, I guess it's not actually a bug, but . . .
> >
> > FrameTicks -> {Automatic, Automatic, None, None}
> >
> > puts tick marks AND numerical labels on bottom and left edges.
> >
> > FrameTicks -> {None, Automatic, Automatic, None}
> >
> > puts tick marks and numerical labels on left edge, tick
> > marks and NO NUMERICAL LABELS on top edge.
And yehuda ben-shimol <bsyehuda at gmail.com> replied:
> use True instead of Automatic -- that is
> FrameTicks -> {None, True, True, None}]
1) This in fact works just fine -- thanks! (and I have to say,
it's a lot simpler than several of the other workarounds
that were proposed . . . )
2) And I guess this could be described at a minimum as a
"documentation bug," since "True" is not listed as an
option in the online Help window for FrameTicks; only
"Automatic" is listed (Mac version 5.1).
- References:
- FrameTicks bug
- From: AES <siegman@stanford.edu>
- FrameTicks bug