Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2005
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*November
*December
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2005

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: FrameTicks bug

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg58636] Re: [mg58630] FrameTicks bug
  • From: yehuda ben-shimol <bsyehuda at gmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 04:19:21 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <200507102051.QAA14639@smc.vnet.net>
  • Reply-to: yehuda ben-shimol <bsyehuda at gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com

use True instead of Automatic
that is
Plot[Sin[x], {x, 0, 2Pi}, Frame -> True, FrameTicks -> {None, True, True, None}]
will give you the required ticks and numerical values
all the best
yehuda

On 7/10/05, AES <siegman at stanford.edu> wrote:
> Well, I guess it's not actually a bug, but . . .
> 
> 
> FrameTicks -> {Automatic, Automatic, None, None}
> 
> puts tick marks AND numerical labels on bottom and left edges.
> 
> 
> FrameTicks -> {None, Automatic, Automatic, None}
> 
> puts tick marks and numerical labels on left edge, tick
> marks and NO NUMERICAL LABELS on top edge.
> 
> 
> How can I put the same Automatic numbers that would
> have been created for the bottom edge, on the top edge?
> 
>


  • Prev by Date: //N bug, but WHY?
  • Next by Date: Re: FrameTicks bug
  • Previous by thread: FrameTicks bug
  • Next by thread: Re: FrameTicks bug (SUMMARY)