[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: question: re-organising equations
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg55229] Re: [mg55179] question: re-organising equations
*From*: DrBob <drbob at bigfoot.com>
*Date*: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 03:29:00 -0500 (EST)
*References*: <200503161035.FAA23761@smc.vnet.net>
*Reply-to*: drbob at bigfoot.com
*Sender*: owner-wri-mathgroup at wolfram.com
> May I trouble you for some suggestions as to how this
> can be achieved?
If the equations are badly non-linear, it probably can't. If it can be done at all, methods will depend on the function f; details are everything.
You can try this, however:
Solve[x == f[a,b,c,d],{a,b,c,d}]
There are also other options such as Reduce, SolveAlways, and FindInstance.
Once you've solved for x, of course y == z == w == x.
Bobby
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:35:54 -0500 (EST), OneTel <david.hanson at student.unsw.edu.au> wrote:
>
>
> I have a set of simultaneous equations which are very long and so I will
> not include them here. They take the form of:
>
> x = f(A,B,C,D)
> y = f(A,B,C,D)
> z = f(A,B,C,D)
> w = f(A,B,C,D)
>
> I would like to re-organise these into the form:
> A = f(x,y,z,w)
> B = f(x,y,z,w)
> C = f(x,y,z,w)
> D = f(x,y,z,w)
>
> May I trouble you for some suggestions as to how this can be achieved?
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> David Hanson
> Research Postgraduate
> UNSW, Kensington 2052 NSW
>
>
>
>
--
DrBob at bigfoot.com
Prev by Date:
**Re: Interaction of Sum/Plus and KroneckerDelta**
Next by Date:
**Re: J/Link problem on Mac OS X**
Previous by thread:
**Re: question: re-organising equations**
Next by thread:
** Re: question: re-organising equations**
| |