RE: Re: General--Mathematica and Subversion
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg72004] RE: [mg71990] Re: General--Mathematica and Subversion
- From: "Owen, HL \(Hywel\)" <h.l.owen at dl.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 06:17:52 -0500 (EST)
> -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Pein [mailto:petsie at dordos.net] > Sent: 07 December 2006 11:26 > To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net > Subject: [mg71990] Re: General--Mathematica and Subversion > > Chris Chiasson schrieb: > > Subversion is really nice. On Gentoo, it has a fairly easy > repository > > install - probably true on other distros as well. For some reason, > > Workbench seems faster than regular Eclipse - even with "the same" > > plugins installed (I imagine Eclipse comes with a lot of > stuff that is > > taken out of Workbench, but I would be hard pressed to name what it > > is). > > > > I do not have got enough experience with these program > systems. But let me > guess: The subversion application has been compiled to native > code whereas eclipse is Java, slow, big, undesirable? > As I said, just a guess. > b.t.w. and OT: The functionality of eclipse pleased me the > two times I used it so far. Is there a version available, > which has been compiled with GNU's gcj? > > On a related point, I would like to configure Workbench under Windows XP to compile Fortran. What I am looking for is a simple, free installation of Fortran under Windows, in a form that I can write and compile within Eclipse. I have seen Min-GW/g95 and Photran. 2 questions: a) Is this the right combination? b) Does anyone know of a step-by-step guide for installing and configuring the whole thing? This is assuming I have a 'bare' PC to start with - no Cygwin, no Min-GW, nothing. I have tried a few 'all you need' installers but even when I RTFM I haven't yet a working compile going. Hywel