Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
MathGroup Archive
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: removing those annoying $$$$'s from local variables names?

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg79702] Re: removing those annoying $$$$'s from local variables names?
  • From: Mark Westwood <markc.westwood at>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 03:49:46 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <f8pk78$2i1$>

Q: What should one do in this case ?

A: Learn to love the way Mathematica displays local variable names
when they are exposed outside the scope of their definition.

Q: In what sense is it a problem that a function returns a symbol with
some minimally cryptic name-mangling ?



Mark Westwood

On 1 Aug, 10:36, Nasser Abbasi <n... at> wrote:
> Hello;
> This is a problem I am sure many have seen. May be there is a simple
> solution for it, but I can't find it.
> This problem is when a function returns back a symbol which is local
> to the function, then these synbols will have $nnnn tacked to them,
> and so when the caller say prints the symbol, it will have those $'s
> numbers, which make it annoying to look it and print, say as a table
> or such.
> This is an example:
> ------------- example 1 -------------
> foo[] := Module[{c, k},
>               c = Array[k, 3]
>           ];
> c = foo[];
> Print[c];
> {k$76[1], k$76[2], k$76[3]}
> --------------------------------------------------
> You see, since k is local to foo[], then when I print it, I see those $
> $$ signs.
> Only way to remove this $$$'s is to make k global as follows
> ------------------------ example 2 -------------------
> Remove[k];
> foo[] := Module[{c},
>               c = Array[k, 3]
>           ];
> c = foo[];
> Print[c];
> {k[1], k[2], k[3]}
> ----------------------------------------
> But making 'k' global is something I do NOT want to do, since now I
> have to worry about 'k' having a value somewhere else in the code, and
> it goes against the whole idea of encapsulation. If I start making all
> my symbols global, then the code becomes hard to manage.
> So, what should one do in this case?  How can make all the symbols
> local to a function, but at the same time not see these $$$'s when the
> symbols are used when they are returned from the function back to the
> caller?
> thanks,
> Nasser

  • Prev by Date: Re: Other PDE heat equation
  • Next by Date: Re: Is Save As->HTML broken in 6.0?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Mathematica 6.0 math.exe question
  • Next by thread: Re: removing those annoying $$$$'s from local variables names?