Mathematica 9 is now available
Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums
-----
 /
MathGroup Archive
2007
*January
*February
*March
*April
*May
*June
*July
*August
*September
*October
*Archive Index
*Ask about this page
*Print this page
*Give us feedback
*Sign up for the Wolfram Insider

MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

RE: hardware for Mathematica 6.0

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg80027] RE: [mg79996] hardware for Mathematica 6.0
  • From: "Owen, HL \(Hywel\)" <h.l.owen at dl.ac.uk>
  • Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 02:01:50 -0400 (EDT)

Hi there,

I can't comment on other aspects, but I can say something about OS. I
did a benchmark test of Mathematica 6.0 on my MacBook running either WinXP or
MacOSX, and they ran basically with identical speeds. In other words, it
appears that Mathematica gives the same performance regardless of OS (at
least for OSX vs XP - I can't speak for Linux).

Hywel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Cardon [mailto:cardon at math.byu.edu] 
> Sent: 10 August 2007 06:52
> To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
> Subject: [mg79996] hardware for Mathematica 6.0
> 
> I'm about to purchase a new computer and good performance 
> with Mathematica 6.0 is my main priority.  Can anyone 
> prioritize which hardware components (dual-core, quad-core, 
> graphics cards, etc) are likely to give the most "bang for 
> the buck" when it comes to dynamic graphics, number 
> crunching, symbolic computation, etc ?
> 
> I can spend up to about $4000.  I was planning on using Windows XP.
> 
> 
> 
> 



  • Prev by Date: Indexed element treated as number?
  • Next by Date: Is Manipulate missing an important feature?
  • Previous by thread: hardware for Mathematica 6.0
  • Next by thread: Re: hardware for Mathematica 6.0