MathGroup Archive 2007

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Can Mathematica do this?

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg79401] Re: Can Mathematica do this?
  • From: dimitris <dimmechan at yahoo.com>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 05:25:32 -0400 (EDT)
  • References: <f86r72$pe8$1@smc.vnet.net>

On 25     , 09:39, "Peter Hensen" <peter_hen... at cox.net> wrote:
> Can Mathematica do this?
> You plug in a complex-valued function, it gives you all the poles of the
> function on the complex plane automatically...

If Mathematica could do anything
what would be the role of the mind?
Just press Shift+Enter?

Mathematica (or CAS in general) is a tool for
helping you doing mathematics (as well other
things!).

But CERTAINLY is not replecement for your brain!

As far as I know there is not such a capability
in Mathematica (at least in versions prior to 6)
through the use of a specific built in function
or via loading a relevant package.

But the very thing is that you can surely use
the incredible symbolic/graphical/numerical
capabilities of Mathematica and as well your
knowledge in complex analysis in order to
deal with a great many complex functions.

The outstanding Micheal Trott Guidebooks
may have relevant material but I didn't
have the time to search on my own.

Visit their web page here

http://www.mathematicaguidebooks.org/

[BTW, as we read in the news section:

...the plan is to have updated editions of the GuideBooks in Summer
2008...
Great news!]

In fact, because what you have asked is
what surely many people would like, I think it
a good idea to search in the archives of MathSource
for relevant packages in www.wolfram.com.

In another CAS (due to the policy of this forum I can't
mention its name; It is the major competitor of Mathematica in the
commercial CAS area)
there is one nice function called FunctionAdvisor

#Below there is code from this CAS#

FunctionAdvisor();
The usage is as follows:

    > FunctionAdvisor( topic, function, ... );

where 'topic' indicates the subject on which advice is required,
'function' is the name of a (the other CAS) function, and '...' represents
possible additional input depending on the 'topic' chosen. To list the
possible topics:

    > FunctionAdvisor( topics );

A short form usage,

    > FunctionAdvisor( function );

with just the name of the function is also available and displays a
summary of information about the function.

#some examples follows now#

FunctionAdvisor(branch_cuts,arcsec);

  [arcsec(z), z  in  RealRange(Open(-1), Open(0)),
        z  in  RealRange(Open(0), Open(1))]

FunctionAdvisor(singularities,tan);

                                          / z        \
      [tan(z), z = infinity + infinity I, |---- - 1/2|::integer]
                                          \ Pi       /

But as far as I understand it cannot deal with user's
function; for example the following returns error message:

FunctionAdvisor(singularities,tan(x)/x);
Error, (in generic_Topic["singularities","singularities"]) invalid
input: generic_Topic[singularities,singularities] expects its 1st
argument, SF, to be of type {function, string, symbol}, but received
tan(x)/x

But not being a specialist for the other CAS (in fact I can't claim
this thing for Mathematica
either!) I can't be sure if in the other CAS there is such a
cabability like that you asked
for.

In fact in another forum I have post a question about exactly this
thing!

See here

http://groups.google.gr/group/sci.math.symbolic/browse_thread/thread/5f558c696235bae5/3009cbfc52568a4a?hl=el#3009cbfc52568a4a

HTH,

Dimitris S. Anagnostou

PS1)

At the very last moment I saw that you asked the same question in
another
forum (specialized for the CAS I didn't mention its name in the main
part of my reply.
Seeing the response you got I think that what you asked for is not
possible neither in the other
CAS through a single command.

PS2)

As a I said you can avoid the use of your complex analysis knowledge!




  • Prev by Date: Re: Re: Re: Wolfram Workbench 1.1 now available
  • Next by Date: RE: Re: Re: Wolfram Workbench 1.1 now available
  • Previous by thread: Re: Can Mathematica do this?
  • Next by thread: Re: Can Mathematica do this?