Re: Re: Mathematica to .NET compiler
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg79576] Re: Re: Mathematica to .NET compiler
- From: Jon Harrop <jon at ffconsultancy.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:38:55 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <200707200725.DAA24728@smc.vnet.net> <f7sflm$rs0$1@smc.vnet.net> <f86onh$g19$1@smc.vnet.net> <f8f40s$s5$1@smc.vnet.net> <32869149.1185684831774.JavaMail.root@m35> <f8hm9p$qun$1@smc.vnet.net>
DrMajorBob wrote: > Wouldn't such a stand-alone executable be, potentially, as large as > Mathematica itself? (Or even larger?) Compiling just ONE line of code > could require binding in the many constituents of DSolve and the > facilities on which it depends, for instance. It doesn't seem practical, > even in theory. Potentially, yes. I doubt you can write a line of code that uses the whole of Mathematica though. Also, Mathematica is only a 23Mb executable. -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy OCaml for Scientists http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/ocaml_for_scientists/?usenet
- References:
- Mathematica to .NET compiler
- From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
- Mathematica to .NET compiler