|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
In article <f2bro8$g3v$1 at smc.vnet.net>,
Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote:
> On 14 May 2007, at 16:33, rip pelletier wrote:
>
> > thanks for the suggestions. it seems the problem is more complicated
> > than i thought. i need to do some work to find out why i get an error
> > message saying Rectangle cannot be called with 3 arguments, although
> > such calls work for other people.
> >
>
> Well, actually, I have to confess that my case may not be decisive
> because, although I use the same version of Mac OS X as you do, I am
> still running a beta version of Mathematica 6.0. If Jens-Peer Kuska
> is also doing that, then it is still possible that this behaviour was
> changed at the last moment. To settle the issue I hope someone else
> with a officially released version of Mathematica confirms that
> Rectangle still works with 3 arguments.
> Of course, Jens may have already confirmed this ;-)
>
> Andrzej Kozlowski
thanks, andrzej. that's a liitle more light on the subject.
as i said in another post, i have a found a much easier replacement
("GraphicsGrid ") for that use of Rectangle, so i no longer care much
about the error message i get.
if someone posts a working example, i'll eagerly give it a try, but i'm
not going to try to construct one.
vale,
rip
--
NB eddress is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t
Prev by Date:
Re: Dynamic PlotLabel in Math6?
Next by Date:
Re: 6.0 not seeing style sheets in $InstallationDirectory/SystemFiles/FrontEnd/StyleSheets
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
Next by thread:
Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle
|
