Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle

*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net*Subject*: [mg76231] Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle*From*: rip pelletier <bitbucket at comcast.net>*Date*: Fri, 18 May 2007 06:10:48 -0400 (EDT)*References*: <200705110933.FAA06232@smc.vnet.net> <f21g6n$7hg$1@smc.vnet.net> <200705140733.DAA22822@smc.vnet.net> <f2bro8$g3v$1@smc.vnet.net>

In article <f2bro8$g3v$1 at smc.vnet.net>, Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz at mimuw.edu.pl> wrote: > On 14 May 2007, at 16:33, rip pelletier wrote: > > > thanks for the suggestions. it seems the problem is more complicated > > than i thought. i need to do some work to find out why i get an error > > message saying Rectangle cannot be called with 3 arguments, although > > such calls work for other people. > > > > Well, actually, I have to confess that my case may not be decisive > because, although I use the same version of Mac OS X as you do, I am > still running a beta version of Mathematica 6.0. If Jens-Peer Kuska > is also doing that, then it is still possible that this behaviour was > changed at the last moment. To settle the issue I hope someone else > with a officially released version of Mathematica confirms that > Rectangle still works with 3 arguments. > Of course, Jens may have already confirmed this ;-) > > Andrzej Kozlowski thanks, andrzej. that's a liitle more light on the subject. as i said in another post, i have a found a much easier replacement ("GraphicsGrid ") for that use of Rectangle, so i no longer care much about the error message i get. if someone posts a working example, i'll eagerly give it a try, but i'm not going to try to construct one. vale, rip -- NB eddress is r i p 1 AT c o m c a s t DOT n e t

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle***From:*Andrzej Kozlowski <akoz@mimuw.edu.pl>

**References**:**v. 6, third argument to rectangle***From:*rip pelletier <bitbucket@comcast.net>

**Re: v. 6, third argument to rectangle***From:*rip pelletier <bitbucket@comcast.net>