Re: Does Mathematica really need more printed,
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg88247] Re: [mg88197] Does Mathematica really need more printed,
- From: AES <siegman at stanford.edu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 06:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
- References: <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>
At 9:14 AM -0400 4/28/08, Richard Palmer wrote:
>I have an additional concern regarding current on-line
>documentation. Some of it does not have a resizable font. That
>makes it difficult for people like me that have glasses and use
>portable computers with smaller screens. I hope that can be fixed
>in a subsequent release.
To voice the same limitation in another way:
Most if not all the online documentation opens by default in a
single-page width window at 100% magnification, which is at best
marginally readable on a laptop screen; and with many of the
subsections closed by default.
Increasing the document magnification, opening all the closed
subsections, and enlarging the window if you wish to do that,
involves a substantial amount of delicate mousing around, all of
which has to be re-done for each new window.
Being able to change the defaults for this would be very handy.
Prev by Date:
Re: Problems with NSolve
Next by Date:
Re: Coordinate readout from Graphics3D?
Previous by thread:
Re: Converting Mathematica code to C++
Next by thread:
Re: Does Mathematica really need more printed, introductory documentation?