|
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Does Mathematica really need more printed, introductory documentation?
- To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
- Subject: [mg88260] Re: Does Mathematica really need more printed, introductory documentation?
- From: Bill Rowe <readnews at sbcglobal.net>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:22:50 -0400 (EDT)
On 4/29/08 at 6:48 AM, rhpalmer at gmail.com (Richard Palmer) wrote:
>I have an additional concern regarding current on-line
>documentation. Some of it does not have a resizable font. That
>makes it difficult for people like me that have glasses and use
>portable computers with smaller screens. I hope that can be fixed in
>a subsequent release.
I don't understand the problem here. The online documentation
open up in a window in the front end just like any notebook. If
you go to the menu bar and select Window->Magnification you will
get a menu list allowing you to select several different
magnification levels up to 300%. When you select one of these,
all of the text is re-scaled by that factor. Isn't this adequate?
Prev by Date:
LayeredGraphPlot without edge crossing.
Next by Date:
Re: 3D Arrows
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Does Mathematica really need more printed,
Next by thread:
Re: Does Mathematica really need more printed, introductory documentation?
|