Services & Resources / Wolfram Forums / MathGroup Archive
-----

MathGroup Archive 2008

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Frustration with opaque functions in Mathematica

  • To: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
  • Subject: [mg93316] Re: Frustration with opaque functions in Mathematica
  • From: Jens-Peer Kuska <kuska at informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
  • Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 05:29:43 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <geeedj$agl$1@smc.vnet.net> <geha5h$fj9$1@smc.vnet.net> <gejj23$2kc$1@smc.vnet.net>

Hi,

 > Finally, Jens are able to figure out what MeijerG[{{1, 1}, {1/2}},
 > {{1, 1}, {0, 0, 0}}, r, 1/2] in terms of elementary functions is for
 > the links that you posted?
 >

You asked for
    "So how can I find out what MeijerG[{{1, 1}, {1/2}},    {{1, 1}, {0, 
0, 0}}, r, 1/2]? really is"
    This can mean almost every thing, is it a
    philosophical question? And the answer would be
    "It is nothing real, it is  pure fiction."

The only way to simplify MeijerG[] would involve the usage
of the relations you can find in the pages I have posted.

And Mathematica will probably not apply all the transformations
listed in the pages. Especial if you wish to get
a special form of the output, Mathematica will not able to find it.

It is always hard to force Mathematica to bring the result in a special
form, but it is impossible if we don't know what you want.

Regards
   Jens




  • Prev by Date: Boundary problem with parameter using NDSolve
  • Next by Date: Re: using the output from a notebook in another notebook
  • Previous by thread: Re: Frustration with opaque functions in Mathematica
  • Next by thread: Re: Frustration with opaque functions in Mathematica