[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Re: publicon
*To*: mathgroup at smc.vnet.net
*Subject*: [mg102278] Re: [mg102260] Re: publicon
*From*: Larry Adelston <larrya at wolfram.com>
*Date*: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 04:25:55 -0400 (EDT)
*References*: <200906271001.GAA28028@smc.vnet.net> <h2cpog$act$1@smc.vnet.net> <200908030946.FAA11983@smc.vnet.net>
Hi Roger,
Please see my responses below.
On Aug 3, 2009, at 4:46 AM, divisor wrote:
> Hello Larry & MathGroup:
>
> Does using Publicon obviate the need for LyX completely?
Yes, if you are only trying to produce LaTeX formats that are
supported by Publicon. However, Publicon is neither a TeX editor nor
viewer. TeX is merely a document export format, and you may, at some
point, need to edit the TeX output directly for publication (to
finesse page breaks for example).
>
> Can you say if Publicon will be subsumed under/inside TeXForm[]?
No, TeXForm[] is used primarily for converting mathematical
expressions one-by-one. If you want to export an entire document, you
must use LaTeX export.
>
> What does Publicon do with active elements (e.g. Manipulate[], Dynamic
> [], et.al.)?
Publicon is currently incompatible with these new active elements,
they would have to be converted to static objects or graphics.
Yours,
Larry
>
> I did some testing with TeXFom[] and I found it cannot "eat"
> Graphics3D
> [], let alone Dynamic[]. But it does process even amazingly
> complicated formulas very nicely!
>
> Regards..
>
> Roger Williams
> Franklin Laboratory
>
> On Jun 30, 3:34 am, Larry Adelston <lar... at wolfram.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2009, at 5:01 AM, alexxx.ma... at gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> I just finished writing an article using LyX to have - as a final
>>> product - a LaTeX file to submit.
>>> Although I rather like LyX (http://www.lyx.org), since I use
>>> Mathematica so much I was interested in seeing how well it
>>> performs in
>>> LaTeX production.
>>
>>>> From what I read in this group I see that I would need to buy
>>> Publicon, but I have a couple of caveats - hope you can help me:
>>
>>> 1) from an old post, mathematica people recently stated (February
>>> 2008, post by Steve Luttrell ) that:
>>> "...we're still working on publicon. We all got sidetracked trying
>>> to finish
>>> M6, but now we're starting up again. We are actively coding a 1.1
>>> release,
>>> and after that we will be integrating it into Mathematica as a
>>> paclet to
>>> exploit v6 features, and also as a stand-alone app, Publicon v2."
>>
>>> any fresher news?
>>
>> We are continuing to support Publicon, and parts of it are currently
>> being developed as native functionality in Mathematica. We may also
>> continue to offer an updated standalone version based on Mathematica
>> Player.
>>
>>
>>
>>> 2) most important, plain LaTeX export is useless without support for
>>> document classes. Does Publicon supports them? I'm mostly looking
>>> for
>>> RevTex4, and IEEEtran. Moreover, it would be useless without the
>>> possibility to add new classes on the fly: often conferences ask you
>>> to download their class package...
>>
>> Publicon already supports export to RevTeX. And we are in the process
>> of expanding Publicon's, as well as Mathematica's, LaTeX export and
>> import capabilities.
>>
>> Your,
>> Larry
>>
>>
>>
>>> thank you for any help...
>>
>>> alessandro
>>
>> __________________________________
>> Larry Adelston
>> Print Production Supervisor
>> Wolfram Research Inc.
>> email: lar... at wolfram.com
>> phone: 217-398-0700, ext.: 3204
>> fax: 217-398-0747http://www.wolfram.com- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
__________________________________
Larry Adelston
Print Production Supervisor
Wolfram Research Inc.
email: larrya at wolfram.com
phone: 217-398-0700, ext.: 3204
fax: 217-398-0747
http://www.wolfram.com
Prev by Date:
**Re: Noob Question re Setting Default Fonts**
Next by Date:
**Re: Noob Question re Setting Default Fonts**
Previous by thread:
**Re: publicon**
Next by thread:
**Re: publicon**
| |